Staff Report 433

Back to Publication

Methods versus Substance: Measuring the Effects of Technology Shocks on Hours

Cristina Fuentes-Albero
Maxym Kryshko
José-Víctor Ríos-Rull - Consultant
Raul Santaeulalia-Llopis
Frank Schorfheide

Published August 12, 2009

Abstract
In this paper, we employ both calibration and modern (Bayesian) estimation methods to assess the role of neutral and investment-specific technology shocks in generating fluctuations in hours. Using a neoclassical stochastic growth model, we show how answers are shaped by the identification strategies and not by the statistical approaches. The crucial parameter is the labor supply elasticity. Both a calibration procedure that uses modern assessments of the Frisch elasticity and the estimation procedures result in technology shocks accounting for 2% to 9% of the variation in hours worked in the data. We infer that we should be talking more about identification and less about the choice of particular quantitative approaches.


Download Paper (PDF)

 
Latest

The Region: Interview with Michael Woodford