According to the Reserve banks' reports, the economic recovery still
appears to be proceeding quite slowly in most districts, with the
industrial sector particularly sluggish. Strikes and strike-related
effects have further dampened economic activity in some districts.
The slow pace of the expansion has not yet generated renewed
inventory accumulation. Retail sales are rising in some districts,
but are slowing in others. The brightest spot continues to be
residential construction. No improvement was noted in the employment
situation. Prior to the President's imposition of the wage-price
freeze, the bank reports indicated no slackening in the pace of
inflation. In the financial sector, all the banks reported that
business loan demand was slack and that flows into consumer savings
accounts had slowed noticeably. Only three banks included reports on
the reactions in their districts to the President's new economic
policies. Initial reactions were highly favorable.
Durable goods manufacturing appears to be the most sluggish sector.
The Boston, Richmond and Cleveland banks reported that new orders
are weak in capital goods industries and backlogs are shrinking. The
St. Louis bank noted that while orders are quite low for steel and
durable goods manufacturers, nondurable goods producers are
optimistic. A number of banks mentioned that suppliers to the
construction industry were experiencing very good sales.
The construction sector is reported except New York. Nonresidential
building, as booming in all districts well as housing starts, was
robust in a number of districts. The San Francisco bank reported
that residential construction is providing the principal stimulus to
the district's economy. Heavy construction activity was cited as a
major reason for low unemployment in several areas within the
Atlanta district.
Half the banks reported that retail sales were rising in their
districts. The San Francisco bank, however, noted that retail sales
were only holding steady and the Atlanta bank reported that sales
have moderated recently. In the New York district, retail sales
varied from trendless to slowing.
There does not appear to be any strengthening of inventory spending.
The Richmond bank reported a substantial increase in the number of
manufacturing firms decreasing inventories and that both trade and
manufacturing inventories were still at higher than desired levels.
Inventory cuts by industrial firms were also expected in the
Cleveland district. Sluggish retail sales were cited by the San
Francisco bank as restraining inventory investment. The St. Louis
bank reported that steel producers expect steel inventories to be
run down over the next six months, depressing their production
levels. The Cleveland bank reported the beginning of coal
stockpiling in anticipation of an October strike in the coal
industry.
Strikes and strike-related effects were depressing economic activity
in several districts. Coal mining areas in the Richmond district
have been hurt by the rail strike and the slowdown in the steel
industry. The copper strike is reported to have affected economic
activity in Maryland, Utah and Arizona. The San Francisco bank noted
that the rail strikes especially hurt shipments of agricultural
products, while the dock strike is affecting a widening number of
industrial and agricultural producers in the twelfth district.
No improvement in the employment situation was noted by any of the
Reserve banks. The employment situation was described as unchanged
by the Richmond, Dallas, and Chicago banks and as weak by the
Minneapolis bank. The Chicago, Cleveland and New York banks reported
high unemployment in steel producing areas, with layoffs continuing
during early August.
Continued inflation at recent rates was mentioned by a number of
banks. The Atlanta and Dallas banks reported that retail prices were
expected to continue increasing at recent rates. A survey of
purchasing managers by the Kansas City bank (made before the
President's August 15 speech) found concern about the near-term
prospects for any slowing in the rate of inflation. In the
Minneapolis and Cleveland districts, concern was reported over the
inflationary effects of the steel settlement and announced steel
price increases. The Minneapolis bank reported that a number of
price and cost increases have already been instituted as a result of
the steel price hikes.
In the financial sector, the demand for business loans was generally
reported as sluggish. The Richmond, San Francisco and Chicago banks,
however, reported either good or improving demand for business loans
in sections of their districts. Most banks also reported a
considerable slowing in the growth of time and savings deposits.
Fears of disintermediation were mentioned by the Kansas City,
Chicago and Atlanta banks.
Only a few banks contacted their respondents after the President's
speech. Philadelphia reported that directors, bankers and
businessmen in the third district, while surprised at the magnitude
of the policy changes, were overwhelmingly in favor of them.
Businessmen noted problems in implementing the wage-price freeze,
but their general mood was one of cooperation and optimism. Initial
reaction in the Chicago district among bankers and businessmen was
also generally favorable. Only one bank director in the Boston
district was available for comment. He was very enthusiastic about
the new policies, although he noted some problems in implementation
for banks. As a result of the President's speech, the Boston bank's
academic respondents were generally encouraged by the prospects for
breaking inflationary expectations and achieving a more stable
international monetary system.